HomeNZ Building CodeQuality & Defects › Defect Process (6-step)

NZ Building Code · Quality & Defects

Handling a defect claim: a step-by-step process

A plain-English walkthrough of how a builder and client work through a suspected defect — from who has to prove what, to checking the contract, consent, specs and standards, then agreeing an outcome in writing.

When a client raises a defect, both sides need a fair, repeatable way to sort it out. This is the process for handling a defect claim, drawn from the MBIE Guide to Tolerances 2015 and the Building Act (ss 362A–V), so builder and client can work off the same authoritative sources instead of arguing over opinions.

The 12-month rule — who has to prove what

Who carries the burden of proof depends on timing:

The step-by-step process

Most defect claims can be worked through in order. Each step checks a more authoritative source than the last:

  1. Talk first. Client notifies the builder verbally and in writing about the suspected defect. Builder inspects in person, takes photos and notes.
  2. Check the contract. What does the contract specify — drawings, specs, schedule of quantities, and an agreed defect tolerance schedule if there is one?
  3. Check the consent. Does the consent and its supporting documentation address this, and was it signed off by the BCA?
  4. Check manufacturer specs. What did the product manufacturer specify for installation, finish and durability? Get the relevant datasheets.
  5. Check NZ Standards. Is there a relevant NZ Standard that defines acceptable workmanship (for example NZS 3604, NZS 3114, NZS 3631)?
  6. Check the MBIE Guide. Does the Guide to Tolerances 2015 cover this? Use it as the final reference for aesthetic and finish issues not covered above.
  7. Decide together. Most issues can be resolved with photos plus reference to an authoritative source. Document the agreed outcome in writing.
  8. Escalate if needed. A Building Code issue goes to the council BCA; a contract issue means seeking legal advice; disputes go to MBIE Building Performance, the Disputes Tribunal, or the Tenancy Tribunal if it’s a rental.

Builder’s checklist when a defect is raised

When a claim comes in, work through this:

Plain-English guide, not advice. This page helps you understand and navigate the rules — it is general information, not design, engineering or consent advice, and it does not reproduce the copyrighted tables of NZS 3604 or any Standard. Always check the current Standard or Acceptable Solution and your BCA, and use a suitably qualified LBP, engineer or QS where it matters.

Common questions

Who has to prove a defect — the builder or the client?

It depends on timing. If the client notifies a defect within 12 months of completion, the builder must prove it’s not defective (or repair it within a reasonable time). After 12 months, the client must prove it’s defective.

How long do implied warranties last?

Implied warranties run for 10 years total.

What order should I check sources in when working through a defect?

Work from most to least specific: the contract (drawings, specs, schedule of quantities, any agreed defect tolerance schedule), then the consent and BCA sign-off, then manufacturer datasheets, then relevant NZ Standards (such as NZS 3604, NZS 3114, NZS 3631), and finally the MBIE Guide to Tolerances 2015 for aesthetic and finish issues not covered above.

What if the builder and client can’t agree?

Escalate based on the issue. A Building Code issue goes to the council BCA, a contract issue means seeking legal advice, and disputes can go to MBIE Building Performance, the Disputes Tribunal, or the Tenancy Tribunal if it’s a rental.

More in Quality & Defects

All Quality & Defects topics → · Full NZ Building Code index

Quote it, comply, get paid — in one app

Toolie turns this knowledge into the job: NZS 3604 take-off, H1 & Healthy Homes, consents, retentions and invoicing — one flat NZD price.

Quote a job free →